HODGSON V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HC AK CIV-2011-404-4052

HODGSON V CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS HC AK CIV-2011-404- 4052 13 July 2011IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALANDAUCKLAND REGISTRYCIV-2011-404-4052BETWEEN WIKI FRANCIS HODGSONApplicantAND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THEDEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSRespondentHearing: 13 July 2011Appearances: Applicant in personA Longdill for RespondentJudgment: 13 July 2011JUDGMENT OF TOOGOOD JWF Hodgson, C/- Mt Eden Correction Facility, Private Bag 92625, Auckland 1150.A Longdill, Meredith Connell, Auckland: anna.longdill@meredithconnell.co.nz[1] Wiki Francis Hodgson is a prisoner in the Mt Eden Correctional Facility, serving a seven month sentence of imprisonment for a variety of offences, including excess blood alcohol.[2] By virtue of his being sentenced to a short term of imprisonment he is entitled under s 86(1) of the Parole Act 2002 to be released on the date on which he has served half of his sentence. Mr Hodgson was told when he was received at Mt Eden Facility that his release date would be 14 June 2011. He became naturally concerned when he was told that in fact he was not to be released on that date,having made arrangements with the Prisoners' Aid and Rehabilitation Society andothers to get back into the community on that day.[3] He has applied for a Writ of Habeas Corpus under the provisions of the Habeas Corpus Act 2001. In terms of that Act, the Chief Executive of the Department of Corrections, who has the responsibility for detaining Mr Hodgson in custody, is required to establish that the detention of Mr Hodgson is lawful. I have received an affidavit from Mr Woodman who is a Senior Operations Advisor for the Department of Corrections National Office, explaining how it is that Mr Hodgson has been detained beyond 14 June 2011.[4] It seems that at the time of Mr Hodgson being received at the prison the computer had shown a release date of 14 June 2011 based on incorrect information, so that the advice Mr Hodgson was given at the time he was received into the prison was incorrect.[5] I am satisfied, having read the evidence, that the correct calculation of Mr Hodgson's release date would see him released next Tuesday on 19 July 2011. That is because his seven month sentence of imprisonment had a start date of 2 May 2011. He was entitled to credit for time served and half of his sentence would be 79 days. That 79 day period expires, as I say, on 19 July 2011, and it can be expected that Mr Hodgson will be released on that date.[6] Mr Hodgson quite properly has said to me that he had planned for his release last month, and his "hopes were dashed". He deserves sympathy for having been put in the position of expecting release on a certain date and then being told he had one month further to serve. Ms Longdill, who appears for the Chief Executive, has extended an apology on behalf of her client. That was properly done. Mr Hodgson has asked that the apology be put in writing. It is not within my power to give that direction but I record that the request was properly made and that Mr Hodgson might be entitled to no less.[7] In the circumstances, however, I am satisfied that Mr Hodgson's continued detention is lawful and I dismiss the application.......................................... Toogood J