RE ESTATE OF ANDREWS [2021] NZHC 3179
The Court held that the will's provisions must be read as an accounting mechanism to equalise the three sons by bringing inter vivos advances (termed "loans" and including specified professional costs) into account when calculating residuary shares; read in context (notably clause 15) and supported by...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] NZHC 3179
- Parties
- Deceased Testatrix: Robyn Margaret Andrews; Applicant and Beneficiary: Evan William Andrews; Applicant and Beneficiary: Richard John Andrews; Applicant, Executor and Trustee: David Bruce Bell; Respondent and Beneficiary: Stephen Robert Andrews
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- New Zealand
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Application for Directions Under Trusts Act 2019 S140; Will Interpretation and Potential Rectification / Judgment on Application for Directions (declared 29 November 2021)
- Outcome
- Direction issued: amounts described as loans/advances to Stephen and associated entities (including specified professional costs) are to be brought into account in calculating the Andrews-Runnymede Trust's share of the residuary estate notwithstanding Stephen's bankruptcy and discharge; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Will Interpretation, Rectification of Wills, Effect of Bankruptcy Discharge on Testamentary Accounting, Directions Under Trusts Act S140, Provable Debts Under Insolvency Act
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robyn Margaret Andrews
Deceased Testatrix
Evan William Andrews
Applicant and Beneficiary
Richard John Andrews
Applicant and Beneficiary
David Bruce Bell
Applicant, Executor and Trustee
Stephen Robert Andrews
Respondent and Beneficiary
Procedural Posture
High Court Application for Directions Under Trusts Act 2019 S140; Will Interpretation and Potential Rectification / Judgment on Application for Directions (declared 29 November 2021)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether loans/advances to Stephen and entities associated with him may be brought into account in calculating the residuary share despite his bankruptcy and discharge
- 2 Whether extrinsic evidence (s32 Wills Act 2007) may be used to ascertain testamentary intention regarding the loans
- 3 Whether the will should be rectified under s31 Wills Act 2007 if the testamentary intention is not reflected in the will's text
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the will's provisions must be read as an accounting mechanism to equalise the three sons by bringing inter vivos advances (termed "loans" and including specified professional costs) into account when calculating residuary shares; read in context (notably clause 15) and supported by contemporaneous extrinsic evidence of the testatrix's intentions, those advances are to be accounted for notwithstanding that related legal debts may have been extinguished on Stephen's discharge from bankruptcy, and therefore the bankruptcy/discharge had no effect on the will's operation in this respect.
Court Disposition
Direction issued: amounts described as loans/advances to Stephen and associated entities (including specified professional costs) are to be brought into account in calculating the Andrews-Runnymede Trust's share of the residuary estate notwithstanding Stephen's bankruptcy and discharge; costs reserved.
Orders
- Loans expressed in the Will of Robyn Andrews dated 22 March 2017 to be due by Stephen and/or entities associated with him are correctly brought to account (together with costs incurred by Mrs Andrews in respect of loan defaults and management) in calculating the net amount due to him (i.e. to the Andrews-Runnymede...
- Stephen's bankruptcy and later discharge from bankruptcy have no effect on the terms of the Will in respect of bringing the loans and specified costs into account
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment