Official Receiver for Northern Ireland v McAnulty [2010] NICA 38 (22 November 2010)

Official Receiver for Northern Ireland v McAnulty [2010] NICA 38 (22 November 2010)

The appellant's exclusive occupation and letting of the premises constituted factual possession and intention to possess, sufficient to establish adverse possession against the Official Receiver. Prior settlements and orders did not negate animus possidendi or create issue estoppel or res judicata. The judge at first instance erred in requiring explicit averment of intention to dispossess the legal owner.

Citation
[2010] NICA 38
Parties
Applicant/respondent to the Appeal: The Official Receiver for Northern Ireland; Appellant/respondent: Patrick Joseph McAnulty
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
22 November 2010
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Bankruptcy) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed; respondent's claim for possession dismissed.
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Bankruptcy Discharge, After Acquired Property, Statute of Limitations
Bankruptcy Property Law Adverse Possession Bankruptcy Discharge After Acquired Property Statute of Limitations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Official Receiver for Northern Ireland

Applicant/respondent to the Appeal

Patrick Joseph McAnulty

Appellant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Bankruptcy) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a discharged bankrupt can acquire possessory title against the trustee in bankruptcy
  2. 2 Whether the appellant had factual possession and animus possidendi
  3. 3 Effect of prior settlement and orders on possessory title claim

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's exclusive occupation and letting of the premises constituted factual possession and intention to possess, sufficient to establish adverse possession against the Official Receiver. Prior settlements and orders did not negate animus possidendi or create issue estoppel or res judicata. The judge at first instance erred in requiring explicit averment of intention to dispossess the legal owner.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; respondent's claim for possession dismissed.

Orders

  • Appellant's appeal allowed.
  • Respondent's claim for possession of the premises dismissed.