Hunter, R. v [2018] NICA 19 (13 April 2018)
The original starting point of 10 years was excessive for a category 2 aggravated burglary with greater culpability but lesser harm; a starting point of 9 years would have been appropriate if fully contested. Given the circumstances and partial guilty pleas, the sentence is reduced to 8 years' imprisonment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] NICA 19
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant/defendant: William Hunter
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Burglary, Sentencing, Firearms Offences, Discount for Guilty Plea
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
William Hunter
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for aggravated burglary was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Appropriate starting point for sentencing in aggravated burglary with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
- 3 Appropriate discount for guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
The original starting point of 10 years was excessive for a category 2 aggravated burglary with greater culpability but lesser harm; a starting point of 9 years would have been appropriate if fully contested. Given the circumstances and partial guilty pleas, the sentence is reduced to 8 years' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
sentence reduced
Orders
- Sentence for aggravated burglary reduced from 9 years to 8 years' imprisonment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment