Young, Re Application for Judicial Review [2007] NICA 32 (06 September 2007)
Commissioner Allen's prior involvement in the earlier appeal decision, which was quashed for procedural irregularities not attributable to him, did not create a real possibility of bias. There was no evidence that he had a motive or incentive to decide the second appeal in a particular way, and the presumption of open-mindedness was not displaced.
- Citation
- [2007] NICA 32
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: William Young; Respondent/appellant: Planning Appeals Commission
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; application for judicial review dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Apparent Bias, Judicial Review, Planning Appeals, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Young
Applicant/respondent
Planning Appeals Commission
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the participation of Commissioner Allen in both the original and subsequent planning appeal decisions gave rise to apparent bias.
Ratio Decidendi
Commissioner Allen's prior involvement in the earlier appeal decision, which was quashed for procedural irregularities not attributable to him, did not create a real possibility of bias. There was no evidence that he had a motive or incentive to decide the second appeal in a particular way, and the presumption of open-mindedness was not displaced.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; application for judicial review dismissed.
Orders
- The decision of the High Court quashing the Planning Appeals Commission's decision is set aside.
- The application for judicial review by William Young is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment