Sterritt & Ors v Stewarts Supermarkets Ltd [2007] NIIT 4208_94 (10 May 2007)
The application for review was made well outside the 14-day limit. The claimants, though legally represented, failed to act promptly or seek discovery when they should have, and no satisfactory explanation was provided for the delay. The tribunal found no misrepresentation by Tesco and held that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The application for review was refused and the decision dismissing Tesco Stores Ltd from the proceedings was confirmed.
- Citation
- [2007] NIIT 4208_94
- Parties
- Claimants: Joan Sterritt & Others; First Named Respondent: Stewarts Supermarkets Ltd; Second Named Respondent: Associated British Foods Pension Trustees Ltd; First Notice Party: Tesco Stores Ltd; Second Notice Party: Tesco Pension Trustees Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal Employment/pension Rights / Application for Review of Earlier Tribunal Decision (pre Hearing Review)
- Outcome
- Application for review refused; decision dismissing Tesco Stores Ltd from proceedings confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Application for Review, Extension of Time, Joinder of Parties, Transfer of Undertakings (tupe), Occupational Pension Rights, Dismissal of Party From Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joan Sterritt & Others
Claimants
Stewarts Supermarkets Ltd
First Named Respondent
Associated British Foods Pension Trustees Ltd
Second Named Respondent
Tesco Stores Ltd
First Notice Party
Tesco Pension Trustees Ltd
Second Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Employment/pension Rights / Application for Review of Earlier Tribunal Decision (pre Hearing Review)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application to review the decision dismissing Tesco Stores Ltd from proceedings should be allowed out of time
- 2 Whether it is just and equitable to extend the 14-day time limit for review
- 3 Whether new evidence or interests of justice require a review
Ratio Decidendi
The application for review was made well outside the 14-day limit. The claimants, though legally represented, failed to act promptly or seek discovery when they should have, and no satisfactory explanation was provided for the delay. The tribunal found no misrepresentation by Tesco and held that it was not just and equitable to extend time. The application for review was refused and the decision dismissing Tesco Stores Ltd from the proceedings was confirmed.
Court Disposition
Application for review refused; decision dismissing Tesco Stores Ltd from proceedings confirmed.
Orders
- Application for review of decision dated 10 March 2006 is refused.
- No extension of time granted under Rule 35(1).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment