Finucane, Application for Judicial Review (Re Decision of the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland) [2024] NICA 55 (07 July 2024)
The Court of Appeal held that the Secretary of State’s decision to defer a public inquiry and await the outcome of further police and ombudsman investigations was unlawful and did not satisfy the promptness and effectiveness requirements of Article 2 ECHR. The Court affirmed that previous investigations, including those by the PSNI and PONI, were insufficient to discharge the State’s Article 2 obligations as identified by the Supreme Court. The ongoing delay constituted a continuing breach, and the Secretary of State was required to reconsider the Government’s response without further delay.
- Citation
- [2024] NICA 55
- Parties
- Respondent/appellant: The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland; Applicant/respondent: Geraldine Finucane; Notice Party: Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland; Notice Party: Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 July 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (king’s Bench Division) to Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; High Court orders affirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Article 2 ECHR (right to Life), State Collusion, Obligation to Investigate Deaths, Delay in Investigations, Judicial Review, Public Inquiry, Human Rights Act 1998
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland
Respondent/appellant
Geraldine Finucane
Applicant/respondent
Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland
Notice Party
Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland
Notice Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court (king’s Bench Division) to Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State’s decision not to establish a public inquiry into the murder of Patrick Finucane was lawful under Article 2 ECHR
- 2 Whether the delay in establishing an Article 2-compliant investigation constituted a breach of the State’s obligations
- 3 Whether further police or ombudsman investigations could remedy the Article 2 deficiencies identified by the Supreme Court
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that the Secretary of State’s decision to defer a public inquiry and await the outcome of further police and ombudsman investigations was unlawful and did not satisfy the promptness and effectiveness requirements of Article 2 ECHR. The Court affirmed that previous investigations, including those by the PSNI and PONI, were insufficient to discharge the State’s Article 2 obligations as identified by the Supreme Court. The ongoing delay constituted a continuing breach, and the Secretary of State was required to reconsider the Government’s response without further delay.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; High Court orders affirmed.
Orders
- Declaration that there has not been an Article 2-compliant inquiry into the death of Patrick Finucane.
- Order requiring the Secretary of State to reconsider the Government’s response to the Supreme Court decision without delay.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment