McMullan v Coleraine Football and Sports Club Ltd & Anor [2006] NICA 26 (26 May 2006)
The trial judge erred in assessing the risk of adhesions and operative intervention at 10 percent each; evidence supported a lower risk. The main injury was the liver, and damages should reflect a 5 percent risk of adhesions and 3 percent risk of operative intervention. General damages reduced accordingly.
- Citation
- [2006] NICA 26
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Robert McMullan; Defendant/appellant: Coleraine Football and Sports Club Limited; Defendant/appellant: Sandel Building Company
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; general damages reduced.
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Future Risk of Injury, Psychiatric Injury, Judicial Review of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert McMullan
Plaintiff/respondent
Coleraine Football and Sports Club Limited
Defendant/appellant
Sandel Building Company
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate quantum for general damages in unusual liver injury
- 2 Assessment of future risk of adhesions and hernia
- 3 Consideration of psychiatric injury
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in assessing the risk of adhesions and operative intervention at 10 percent each; evidence supported a lower risk. The main injury was the liver, and damages should reflect a 5 percent risk of adhesions and 3 percent risk of operative intervention. General damages reduced accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; general damages reduced.
Orders
- General damages reduced from £75,000 to £62,500 with interest at 2% from 27 June 2001 and judgment rate from date of judgment.
- Special damages of £1,000 awarded at judgment rate from date of judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment