Wilson v Gilroy & Anor [2008] NICA 23 (7 May 2008)
The award of £150,000 in damages was within the appropriate bracket for the multiplicity and severity of injuries suffered by Mrs Wilson, including severe psychiatric harm, and was not based on any erroneous principle or misapprehension of facts. The correct rate of interest is 2% per annum from the date of issue of proceedings.
- Citation
- [2008] NICA 23
- Parties
- Respondent/plaintiff: Dorothy Helen Wilson; Appellant/defendant: James Anthony Gilroy; Appellant/defendant: Motor Insurers' Bureau
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Psychiatric Injury, Interest on Damages, Guidelines for Damages, Appellate Review of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dorothy Helen Wilson
Respondent/plaintiff
James Anthony Gilroy
Appellant/defendant
Motor Insurers' Bureau
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's award of damages was erroneous or outside the appropriate bracket
- 2 Appropriate application of guidelines for assessment of damages
- 3 Correct rate and period for interest on damages
Ratio Decidendi
The award of £150,000 in damages was within the appropriate bracket for the multiplicity and severity of injuries suffered by Mrs Wilson, including severe psychiatric harm, and was not based on any erroneous principle or misapprehension of facts. The correct rate of interest is 2% per annum from the date of issue of proceedings.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Award of £150,000 in damages upheld
- Interest at 2% per annum payable from 29 October 2002 (date of issue of proceedings) until payment of principal sum
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment