Wilson v Gilroy & Anor [2009] NICA 48 (13 October 2009)
The trial judge's award for general damages was within the appropriate bracket for moderately severe psychiatric injury and not wholly erroneous; however, the multiplier/multiplicand method for future loss was inappropriate given uncertainties, warranting a broad brush lump sum assessment. The plaintiff is entitled to additional compensation for future loss and interest on damages.
- Citation
- [2009] NICA 48
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Robert Wesley Wilson; Defendant/respondent: James Anthony Gilroy; Defendant/respondent: Motor Insurers' Bureau
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Assessment of Damages, Psychiatric Injury, Interest on Damages, Future Loss Calculation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Wesley Wilson
Plaintiff/appellant
James Anthony Gilroy
Defendant/respondent
Motor Insurers' Bureau
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the award for general damages was wholly erroneous
- 2 Appropriateness of the multiplier/multiplicand method for future loss
- 3 Entitlement to interest on damages
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's award for general damages was within the appropriate bracket for moderately severe psychiatric injury and not wholly erroneous; however, the multiplier/multiplicand method for future loss was inappropriate given uncertainties, warranting a broad brush lump sum assessment. The plaintiff is entitled to additional compensation for future loss and interest on damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Future financial loss reassessed and increased to £90,000
- Interest awarded at 2% on general damages from writ date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment