Ramsey, R v [2016] NICA 13 (29 February 2016)
The conviction was unsafe because the evidence of the co-accused's guilty plea was given unsupportable weight, the prosecution failed to clearly prove that at least £17,500 of the funds represented proceeds of crime, and the trial judge's directions to the jury were inconsistent and inadequate regarding the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] NICA 13
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant/defendant: Heather Ramsey
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
- Outcome
- conviction quashed
- Legal Topics
- Concealing Criminal Property, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, Admissibility of Co Accused Plea, Burden of Proof, Unsafe Conviction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Heather Ramsey
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From Crown Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction was unsafe due to the admission and treatment of co-accused's guilty plea
- 2 Whether the prosecution proved that at least £17,500 of the £22,000 was proceeds of crime
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing a direction of no case to answer
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction was unsafe because the evidence of the co-accused's guilty plea was given unsupportable weight, the prosecution failed to clearly prove that at least £17,500 of the funds represented proceeds of crime, and the trial judge's directions to the jury were inconsistent and inadequate regarding the probative value of the co-accused's plea and the possibility of legitimate savings.
Court Disposition
conviction quashed
Orders
- Conviction quashed; court to hear counsel on whether a retrial should be ordered.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment