Mejury v Dr K E Clarke and Others, t/a ... Peninsula Business Services Lt... Dr K E Clarke and Others, t/a ... Peninsula Business Services Lt... Dr K E Clarke and Others, t/a ... Peninsula Business Services Lt... Dr K E Clarke and Others, t/a ... Peninsula Business Services Lt... [2013] NIIT 00271_12IT (12 March 2013)
The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed and subjected to unlawful disability discrimination by the first-named respondent. The surgery failed to make reasonable adjustments, diminished the claimant's role, and created an environment that undermined trust and confidence, amounting to a fundamental breach of contract. The claim against the second-named respondent was dismissed as there was insufficient evidence that Peninsula knowingly aided any unlawful act.
- Citation
- [2013] NIIT 00271_12IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Gael Mejury; First Named Respondent: Dr K E Clarke and Others, t/a Carryduff Surgery; Second Named Respondent: Peninsula Business Services Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant succeeded in claims of constructive dismissal and disability discrimination against the first-named respondent; claim against the second-named respondent dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Harassment, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gael Mejury
Claimant
Dr K E Clarke and Others, t/a Carryduff Surgery
First Named Respondent
Peninsula Business Services Ltd
Second Named Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was directly discriminated against on the ground of her disability
- 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to harassment related to her disability
- 3 Whether the surgery failed to make reasonable adjustments for the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively dismissed and subjected to unlawful disability discrimination by the first-named respondent. The surgery failed to make reasonable adjustments, diminished the claimant's role, and created an environment that undermined trust and confidence, amounting to a fundamental breach of contract. The claim against the second-named respondent was dismissed as there was insufficient evidence that Peninsula knowingly aided any unlawful act.
Court Disposition
Claimant succeeded in claims of constructive dismissal and disability discrimination against the first-named respondent; claim against the second-named respondent dismissed.
Orders
- First-named respondent to pay the claimant £26,098.34 as compensation for constructive dismissal and unlawful disability discrimination.
- Claim against Peninsula Business Services Ltd dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment