Kerr v Toal [2015] NIQB 83 (12 February 2015)

Kerr v Toal [2015] NIQB 83 (12 February 2015)

In credit hire claims, plaintiffs must promptly indicate whether they rely on impecuniosity and, if so, provide limited, relevant financial disclosure (earnings, bank statements, savings, outgoings) for the period immediately before the accident. Interrogatories and discovery beyond this are disproportionate and unnecessary. If impecuniosity is not claimed, no further disclosure is required. Applications for extensive interrogatories or discovery are generally refused unless strictly necessary and proportionate.

Citation
[2015] NIQB 83
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Ann Kerr; Defendant/respondent: Conor Toal; Plaintiff/appellant: Declan Gordon; Defendant/respondent: Vera Best; Defendant/respondent: Iain Best; Plaintiff/respondent: Margaret Gregory; Defendant/applicant: Olivia Cashel O'Farrell; Plaintiff/appellant: John Chadwick; Defendant/respondent: Pawel Kaczor
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
12 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeals From County Court Interlocutory Decisions / Interlocutory Appeals in Credit Hire Damages Claims
Outcome
Appeals allowed or varied in part; orders for disclosure/interrogatories modified or refused as appropriate in each case.
Legal Topics
Credit Hire Claims, Discovery and Interrogatories, Impecuniosity, Costs, Road Traffic Accidents
Civil Procedure Tort Law Insurance Law Credit Hire Claims Discovery and Interrogatories Impecuniosity Costs Road Traffic Accidents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ann Kerr

Plaintiff/appellant

Conor Toal

Defendant/respondent

Declan Gordon

Plaintiff/appellant

Vera Best

Defendant/respondent

Iain Best

Defendant/respondent

Margaret Gregory

Plaintiff/respondent

Olivia Cashel O'Farrell

Defendant/applicant

John Chadwick

Plaintiff/appellant

Pawel Kaczor

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeals From County Court Interlocutory Decisions / Interlocutory Appeals in Credit Hire Damages Claims

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether plaintiffs in credit hire claims must answer interrogatories or provide discovery regarding impecuniosity
  2. 2 Appropriate scope and timing of disclosure in credit hire litigation
  3. 3 Proportionality and necessity of interrogatories and discovery in small claims

Ratio Decidendi

In credit hire claims, plaintiffs must promptly indicate whether they rely on impecuniosity and, if so, provide limited, relevant financial disclosure (earnings, bank statements, savings, outgoings) for the period immediately before the accident. Interrogatories and discovery beyond this are disproportionate and unnecessary. If impecuniosity is not claimed, no further disclosure is required. Applications for extensive interrogatories or discovery are generally refused unless strictly necessary and proportionate.

Court Disposition

Appeals allowed or varied in part; orders for disclosure/interrogatories modified or refused as appropriate in each case.

Orders

  • Plaintiffs to indicate within seven days whether impecuniosity is relied upon; if so, provide specified financial documents for three months prior to accident.
  • If impecuniosity not relied upon, no further interrogatories or discovery required.