Department of the Environment and Heritage Service v Felix O'Hare & Co Ltd & Anor (t/a Phillips Contracts) [2007] NICA 45 (27 November 2007)
On the undisputed facts, the excavated soil and clay were material that had to be disposed of and were thus discarded within the meaning of the legislation. The material fell within the definition of waste and, being from a school site, constituted household or industrial waste and thus controlled waste under the 1997 Order and relevant regulations.
- Citation
- [2007] NICA 45
- Parties
- Complainant/appellant: Department of the Environment and Heritage Service; Defendant/respondent: Felix O'Hare & Co Ltd; Defendant/respondent: James Phillips t/a Phillips Contracts
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Court of Appeal Decision on Question of Law From Magistrates' Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Controlled Waste, Interpretation of Waste Under Domestic and EU Law, Waste Management Licensing, Excavated Soil as Waste
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Department of the Environment and Heritage Service
Complainant/appellant
Felix O'Hare & Co Ltd
Defendant/respondent
James Phillips t/a Phillips Contracts
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Court of Appeal Decision on Question of Law From Magistrates' Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether soil and clay excavated from a playing field site constitute 'controlled waste' under the Waste and Contaminated Land (Northern Ireland) Order 1997
Ratio Decidendi
On the undisputed facts, the excavated soil and clay were material that had to be disposed of and were thus discarded within the meaning of the legislation. The material fell within the definition of waste and, being from a school site, constituted household or industrial waste and thus controlled waste under the 1997 Order and relevant regulations.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Answer to the case stated is 'no'—the Resident Magistrate was not correct in law.
- Matter remitted to the Resident Magistrate to hear and determine in accordance with law in light of this ruling.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment