SCA Packaging Ltd v Boyle [2008] NICA 48 (09 October 2008)
The claimant had an existing impairment (innate weakness of voice with propensity to vocal nodules) at the relevant time, and but for the voice management regime, substantial adverse long-term effects were likely to recur. The management regime constituted 'measures' under paragraph 6 Schedule 1 DDA. The Tribunal's reasoning was flawed for not addressing existence of impairment, but the Court of Appeal drew the necessary inference from the evidence and found the statutory requirements for disability were met.
- Citation
- [2008] NICA 48
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: SCA Packaging Limited; Respondent/claimant: Elizabeth Boyle
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Disability Discrimination Appeal (case Stated From Industrial Tribunal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's findings upheld with clarification.
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Disability Under Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Interpretation of 'likelihood' in Statutory Context, Application of Schedule 1 Paragraphs 2(2) and 6(1) DDA
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SCA Packaging Limited
Appellant/respondent
Elizabeth Boyle
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Disability Discrimination Appeal (case Stated From Industrial Tribunal) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimant was a disabled person under section 1 DDA during relevant period
- 2 Whether management regime constituted 'measures' under paragraph 6 Schedule 1 DDA
- 3 Whether effects after removal of vocal nodules were substantial
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant had an existing impairment (innate weakness of voice with propensity to vocal nodules) at the relevant time, and but for the voice management regime, substantial adverse long-term effects were likely to recur. The management regime constituted 'measures' under paragraph 6 Schedule 1 DDA. The Tribunal's reasoning was flawed for not addressing existence of impairment, but the Court of Appeal drew the necessary inference from the evidence and found the statutory requirements for disability were met.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Tribunal's findings upheld with clarification.
Orders
- Court of Appeal answers: Question 1 – No; Question 2 – No; Question 3 – Does not arise; Question 4 – Does not arise.
- No remittal to Tribunal; Court draws inference of existing impairment and finds statutory disability requirements met.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment