Quinn v The Department For The Economy [2024] NICh 8 (25 June 2024)

Quinn v The Department For The Economy [2024] NICh 8 (25 June 2024)

The application for leave to appeal and extension of time was refused because the appellant failed to provide any adequate explanation for delay, had multiple opportunities to present his case, and the grounds for disqualification were established on the evidence. There was no procedural unfairness, and no substantive legal point justifying further appeal.

Citation
[2024] NICh 8
Parties
Respondent/appellant: Michael Quinn; Applicant/respondent: The Department for the Economy
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
25 June 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal (chancery Division, Companies) / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time to Appeal; Decision on Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed; leave to appeal and extension of time refused; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Directors' Disqualification, Procedural Fairness, Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure
Company Law Insolvency Law Directors' Disqualification Procedural Fairness Extension of Time Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael Quinn

Respondent/appellant

The Department for the Economy

Applicant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (chancery Division, Companies) / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time to Appeal; Decision on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal and extension of time to appeal should be granted against a directors' disqualification order
  2. 2 Whether procedural fairness was denied to the appellant
  3. 3 Whether the grounds for directors' disqualification were established

Ratio Decidendi

The application for leave to appeal and extension of time was refused because the appellant failed to provide any adequate explanation for delay, had multiple opportunities to present his case, and the grounds for disqualification were established on the evidence. There was no procedural unfairness, and no substantive legal point justifying further appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; leave to appeal and extension of time refused; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Application for leave to appeal refused
  • Application for extension of time refused