DB v WH; A Health And Social Care Trust v WH & Anor [2026] NIFam 10(15 April 2026)
The court found that the mother failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the father engaged in physical assault or coercive control. There was no credible evidence of such conduct, and the allegations were not contemporaneously reported or supported by documentation. However, the court found that the father repeatedly used vulgar and demeaning language towards the mother, including in the presence or vicinity of the child, which was inappropriate and degrading but did not amount to domestic abuse as defined by statute. The father had no involvement in his mother's unlawful accessing of records.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 108
- Parties
- Applicant (father): DB; Respondent (mother): WH; Applicant (trust): A Health and Social Care Trust; Respondent (mother, in Trust Application): WH; Respondent (father, in Trust Application): DB; Guardian: Children's Court Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 April 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (child Arrangements, Domestic Abuse Fact Finding) / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Findings of fact made: no physical assault or coercive control by the father; repeated verbal abuse by the father established; no involvement by the father in unlawful data access.
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Contact Orders, Residence Orders, Supervision Orders, Fact Finding Hearings, Coercive Control, Parental Responsibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DB
Applicant (father)
WH
Respondent (mother)
A Health and Social Care Trust
Applicant (trust)
WH
Respondent (mother, in Trust Application)
DB
Respondent (father, in Trust Application)
Children's Court Guardian
Guardian
Procedural Posture
Family Law (child Arrangements, Domestic Abuse Fact Finding) / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the father (DB) engaged in domestic abuse, including physical assault and coercive control, against the mother (WH)
- 2 Whether the father used vulgar and demeaning language in the presence of the child
- 3 Whether the father or his mother unlawfully accessed confidential information about the mother and child
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the mother failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the father engaged in physical assault or coercive control. There was no credible evidence of such conduct, and the allegations were not contemporaneously reported or supported by documentation. However, the court found that the father repeatedly used vulgar and demeaning language towards the mother, including in the presence or vicinity of the child, which was inappropriate and degrading but did not amount to domestic abuse as defined by statute. The father had no involvement in his mother's unlawful accessing of records.
Court Disposition
Findings of fact made: no physical assault or coercive control by the father; repeated verbal abuse by the father established; no involvement by the father in unlawful data access.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment