Ulster Bank Ltd v Jan [2019] NICh 7 (17 May 2019)
The Bank was entitled to possession as it held equitable mortgages over both properties, the appellant was indebted, the facilities were repayable on demand, and the appellant defaulted. Disputes as to the precise quantum did not preclude possession, and the offer to purchase was insufficient. No grounds existed to stay or suspend the order.
- Citation
- [2019] NICh 7
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Ulster Bank Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Her Juing Jan
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order for Possession and Charging of Property
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equitable Mortgage, Order for Possession, Bank's Standing, Calculation of Debt, Stay of Possession Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ulster Bank Ltd
Plaintiff/respondent
Her Juing Jan
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order for Possession and Charging of Property
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Bank was entitled to an order for possession based on equitable mortgages
- 2 Whether the quantum of debt was correctly calculated
- 3 Whether the Bank had standing to bring the action
Ratio Decidendi
The Bank was entitled to possession as it held equitable mortgages over both properties, the appellant was indebted, the facilities were repayable on demand, and the appellant defaulted. Disputes as to the precise quantum did not preclude possession, and the offer to purchase was insufficient. No grounds existed to stay or suspend the order.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Refusal to stay or suspend the possession order
- Possession order stands as per Master's decision
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment