Ulster Bank Ltd v Jan [2019] NICh 7 (17 May 2019)

Ulster Bank Ltd v Jan [2019] NICh 7 (17 May 2019)

The Bank was entitled to possession as it held equitable mortgages over both properties, the appellant was indebted, the facilities were repayable on demand, and the appellant defaulted. Disputes as to the precise quantum did not preclude possession, and the offer to purchase was insufficient. No grounds existed to stay or suspend the order.

Citation
[2019] NICh 7
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Ulster Bank Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Her Juing Jan
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
17 May 2019
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order for Possession and Charging of Property
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Equitable Mortgage, Order for Possession, Bank's Standing, Calculation of Debt, Stay of Possession Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ulster Bank Ltd

Plaintiff/respondent

Her Juing Jan

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Order for Possession and Charging of Property

  1. 1 Whether the Bank was entitled to an order for possession based on equitable mortgages
  2. 2 Whether the quantum of debt was correctly calculated
  3. 3 Whether the Bank had standing to bring the action

Ratio Decidendi

The Bank was entitled to possession as it held equitable mortgages over both properties, the appellant was indebted, the facilities were repayable on demand, and the appellant defaulted. Disputes as to the precise quantum did not preclude possession, and the offer to purchase was insufficient. No grounds existed to stay or suspend the order.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Refusal to stay or suspend the possession order
  • Possession order stands as per Master's decision