Fermanagh District Council v Gibson (Banbridge) Ltd [2014] NICA 46 (17 June 2014)
The circumstances in which Fermanagh failed to serve a notice of intention to refer to arbitration within the contractual time limit were not outside the reasonable contemplation of the parties when they agreed the contract. Disputes about the adjudicator's jurisdiction are foreseeable in construction contracts. Therefore, the court had no power to extend time under section 12(3)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996, and the appeal must be allowed.
- Citation
- [2014] NICA 46
- Parties
- Respondent/applicant: Fermanagh District Council; Appellant/respondent: Gibson (Banbridge) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Commercial) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Arbitration, Adjudication in Construction Contracts, Interpretation of Arbitration Clauses, Jurisdiction of Adjudicator, Party Autonomy in Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fermanagh District Council
Respondent/applicant
Gibson (Banbridge) Limited
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Commercial) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can extend time for service of notice of intention to refer a dispute to arbitration under section 12 of the Arbitration Act 1996 in the circumstances of this case
- 2 Whether the circumstances were outside the reasonable contemplation of the parties when agreeing the time bar provision
- 3 Whether serving a notice of intention to refer is a step to begin arbitration for the purposes of section 12
Ratio Decidendi
The circumstances in which Fermanagh failed to serve a notice of intention to refer to arbitration within the contractual time limit were not outside the reasonable contemplation of the parties when they agreed the contract. Disputes about the adjudicator's jurisdiction are foreseeable in construction contracts. Therefore, the court had no power to extend time under section 12(3)(a) of the Arbitration Act 1996, and the appeal must be allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order extending time for service of notice of intention to refer to arbitration set aside
- Court to hear counsel on the question of costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment