Hamilton v Dornan (Deceased), Personal Representative Of [2006] NIQB 104 (12 December 2006)
The plaintiff failed to show good reason for not serving the writ or applying for extension before expiry; ongoing negotiations and awaiting medical reports are not sufficient grounds; no agreement or conduct by defendant justifying extension was established.
- Citation
- [2006] NIQB 104
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: Robert Hamilton; Defendant/respondent: The Personal Representative of Jonathan Mark Dornan (Deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Master's Order Refusing Extension of Validity of Writ
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Validity of Writ, Service of Process, Limitation Period, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert Hamilton
Plaintiff/appellant
The Personal Representative of Jonathan Mark Dornan (Deceased)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Master's Order Refusing Extension of Validity of Writ
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was good reason to extend the validity of the writ after expiry
- 2 Whether ongoing negotiations or awaiting medical reports constitute good reason for non-service
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to show good reason for not serving the writ or applying for extension before expiry; ongoing negotiations and awaiting medical reports are not sufficient grounds; no agreement or conduct by defendant justifying extension was established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Decision of the Master affirmed
- Plaintiff to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment