Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission v McGillion [2002] NICA 3 (11 January 2002)
The standard of proof for forfeiture under Section 64 of the Foyle Fisheries Act (Northern Ireland) 1952 is the civil standard of balance of probabilities, and the requirement to serve a copy of the case stated within 14 days under Article 146(9) of the Magistrates' Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981 is directory, not mandatory, to ensure compatibility with Article 6(1) ECHR.
- Citation
- [2002] NICA 3
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission; Respondent/appellant: Paula McGillion
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Forfeiture Proceedings, Standard of Proof, Interpretation of Statutory Requirements, Right to Appeal, Compatibility With European Convention on Human Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Foyle, Carlingford and Irish Lights Commission
Applicant/respondent
Paula McGillion
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the standard of proof for forfeiture under Section 64 of the Foyle Fisheries Act (Northern Ireland) 1952 is the balance of probabilities or beyond reasonable doubt
- 2 Whether the requirement to serve a copy of the case stated within 14 days under Article 146(9) of the Magistrates' Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981 is mandatory or directory in light of Article 6(1) ECHR
Ratio Decidendi
The standard of proof for forfeiture under Section 64 of the Foyle Fisheries Act (Northern Ireland) 1952 is the civil standard of balance of probabilities, and the requirement to serve a copy of the case stated within 14 days under Article 146(9) of the Magistrates' Courts (Northern Ireland) Order 1981 is directory, not mandatory, to ensure compatibility with Article 6(1) ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The question posed in the case stated is answered in the affirmative.
- Time for service of the case stated is extended; appeal allowed to proceed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment