Caldwell v Melmount Foods [2007] NIIT 1609_05 (25 April 2007)
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he had not taken or been paid for holidays accrued in 2004/05 and found no documentary evidence to the contrary; therefore, the claimant was entitled to three weeks' holiday pay for that year, increasing the total due from the first respondent to £1,041.68.
- Citation
- [2007] NIIT 1609_05
- Parties
- Claimant: Brian Caldwell; First Respondent: Melmount Foods; Second Respondent: Department for Employment & Learning
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal Review / Decision on Review
- Outcome
- Prior decision amended; sum due to claimant increased.
- Legal Topics
- Holiday Pay, Insolvency, Employment Rights Order (northern Ireland) 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Brian Caldwell
Claimant
Melmount Foods
First Respondent
Department for Employment & Learning
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Review / Decision on Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to holiday pay for the 2004/05 holiday year
- 2 Whether the Department for Employment & Learning was liable for payment under Article 229 of the Employment Rights Order (Northern Ireland) 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that he had not taken or been paid for holidays accrued in 2004/05 and found no documentary evidence to the contrary; therefore, the claimant was entitled to three weeks' holiday pay for that year, increasing the total due from the first respondent to £1,041.68.
Court Disposition
Prior decision amended; sum due to claimant increased.
Orders
- The sum of £1,041.68 is substituted for the sum of £260.42 previously adjudged to be payable by the first respondent to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment