Finucane, Re Judicial Review [2012] NICA 12 (15 May 2012)
In cases where a criminal aid certificate was granted before 13 April 2011, the 2005 Rules govern the assessment of costs, even if a new certificate is granted to assign a different solicitor after that date. Rule 3(2) of the 2011 Rules is clear and creates a statutory exception to the new remuneration regime.
- Citation
- [2012] NICA 12
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: John Finucane; Respondent/appellant: Northern Ireland Legal Services Commission (LSC); Intervener: Department of Justice (DoJ); Intervener: Bar Council of Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Legal Aid Certificates, Assignment of Solicitors, Transitional Provisions in Legal Aid Remuneration, Interpretation of Statutory Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Finucane
Applicant/respondent
Northern Ireland Legal Services Commission (LSC)
Respondent/appellant
Department of Justice (DoJ)
Intervener
Bar Council of Northern Ireland
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2011 Rules or 2005 Rules apply to remuneration when a new solicitor is assigned after 13 April 2011 under a criminal aid certificate granted before that date
- 2 Whether assignment of a new solicitor requires a new criminal aid certificate or amendment of the original certificate
Ratio Decidendi
In cases where a criminal aid certificate was granted before 13 April 2011, the 2005 Rules govern the assessment of costs, even if a new certificate is granted to assign a different solicitor after that date. Rule 3(2) of the 2011 Rules is clear and creates a statutory exception to the new remuneration regime.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of Treacy J is upheld, but for different reasons as set out in the judgment.
- Costs to be assessed under the 2005 Rules in this case.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment