Harwood, R. v [2007] NICA 49 (9 November 2007)
Given the deliberate and substantial violence inflicted with a knife, the appellant's criminal record, and the aggravating factors present, the sentence of thirteen years was within the proper range for this type of manslaughter. The trial judge did not err in the credit given for the guilty plea, the refusal to impose a custody probation order, or in the weight given to the possibility of initial self-defence. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
- Citation
- [2007] NICA 49
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Appellant/defendant: Glenn Paul Harwood
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Sentencing, Self Defence, Custody Probation Order, Mitigation, Aggravating Factors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Glenn Paul Harwood
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of thirteen years for manslaughter was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether sufficient credit was given for the guilty plea to manslaughter
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in not imposing a custody probation order
Ratio Decidendi
Given the deliberate and substantial violence inflicted with a knife, the appellant's criminal record, and the aggravating factors present, the sentence of thirteen years was within the proper range for this type of manslaughter. The trial judge did not err in the credit given for the guilty plea, the refusal to impose a custody probation order, or in the weight given to the possibility of initial self-defence. The sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Sentence of thirteen years imprisonment for manslaughter affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment