Devine v McAteer [2014] NICA 50 (30 June 2014)
The appeal was allowed because the evidence did not establish that the appellant gave negligent advice to the respondent or assumed responsibility for advice passed through her husband, and the respondent recouped her investment with no pleaded claim for loss of income or interest. The case was not proved on the pleaded facts.
- Citation
- [2014] NICA 50
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Mary Devine; Defendant/appellant: Daniel McAteer
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Negligent Misstatement, Breach of Contract, Measure of Damages, Professional Duty of Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Devine
Plaintiff/respondent
Daniel McAteer
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant negligently advised the respondent regarding EIS tax relief eligibility for share investment
- 2 Whether there was a contractual or tortious breach by the appellant in relation to the advice given
- 3 Whether damages were properly awarded based on the pleaded case
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the evidence did not establish that the appellant gave negligent advice to the respondent or assumed responsibility for advice passed through her husband, and the respondent recouped her investment with no pleaded claim for loss of income or interest. The case was not proved on the pleaded facts.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Award of damages to respondent set aside
- Court to hear parties on the issue of costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment