Stewart v Department of Finance & Personnel [2012] NIQB 43 (19 June 2012)
The two hours overtime constituted conditioned overtime, which was both compulsory and guaranteed under the plaintiff's contract. The defendant breached the contract by failing to make the overtime available from June 2008.
- Citation
- [2012] NIQB 43
- Parties
- Plaintiff/appellant: William Stewart; Defendant/respondent: Department of Finance and Personnel
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Contract Dispute (appeal) / Appeal From County Court; Judgment on Liability
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff on liability; damages to be assessed
- Legal Topics
- Overtime Entitlement, Contractual Terms, Breach of Contract, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
William Stewart
Plaintiff/appellant
Department of Finance and Personnel
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Contract Dispute (appeal) / Appeal From County Court; Judgment on Liability
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff was contractually entitled to two hours of guaranteed and compulsory overtime per day
- 2 Whether the defendant breached the employment contract by unilaterally removing the overtime
- 3 Whether damages should be limited to the notice period
Ratio Decidendi
The two hours overtime constituted conditioned overtime, which was both compulsory and guaranteed under the plaintiff's contract. The defendant breached the contract by failing to make the overtime available from June 2008.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff on liability; damages to be assessed
Orders
- Damages to be agreed between parties or determined at a later hearing
- Review date to be fixed for assessment of damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment