Stokes v Tudor Journals Ltd [2008] NIFET 558_00FET (06 March 2008)
Remarks made to claimant of English national origin during interview created an intimidating environment and constituted discrimination on grounds of national origin; respondent failed to provide adequate explanation or take reasonable steps to prevent the act.
- Citation
- [2008] NIFET 558_00FET
- Parties
- Claimant: Mark Stokes; First Respondent: Tudor Journals Ltd; Second Respondent: Tom Mackin
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim for discrimination on grounds of national origin upheld; claim for religious belief or political opinion dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, National Origin Discrimination, Harassment, Religious Belief Discrimination, Political Opinion Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Stokes
Claimant
Tudor Journals Ltd
First Respondent
Tom Mackin
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether remarks made during interview constituted discrimination on grounds of race, national origin, religious belief or political opinion
Ratio Decidendi
Remarks made to claimant of English national origin during interview created an intimidating environment and constituted discrimination on grounds of national origin; respondent failed to provide adequate explanation or take reasonable steps to prevent the act.
Court Disposition
Claim for discrimination on grounds of national origin upheld; claim for religious belief or political opinion dismissed.
Orders
- Respondents to pay claimant £1,000.00 as damages for hurt feelings.
- No award of interest due to delays in proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment