Zak v Fork and Cork Ltd t/a 4th Wall...Johny Hamilton [2015] NIIT 00055_15IT_2 (24 September 2015)
The tribunal determined that the original award for injury to feelings was insufficient and increased it to £6,500 to more appropriately reflect the impact of the race discrimination suffered by the claimant.
- Citation
- [2015] NIIT 00055_15IT_2
- Parties
- Claimant: Michal Zak; First Respondent: Fork and Cork Ltd t/a Fourth Wall Restaurant; Second Respondent: Johnny Hamilton
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal Review / Application for Review of Compensation Award
- Outcome
- Award varied on review; compensation increased.
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Compensation for Injury to Feelings, Written Particulars of Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michal Zak
Claimant
Fork and Cork Ltd t/a Fourth Wall Restaurant
First Respondent
Johnny Hamilton
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Review / Application for Review of Compensation Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the compensation for injury to feelings awarded for race discrimination was adequate
- 2 Whether the total compensation should be varied on review
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal determined that the original award for injury to feelings was insufficient and increased it to £6,500 to more appropriately reflect the impact of the race discrimination suffered by the claimant.
Court Disposition
Award varied on review; compensation increased.
Orders
- First respondent to pay £6,500 for injury to feelings to the claimant.
- First respondent to pay £540 for loss of earnings to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment