Wilson v Commissioner of Valuation [2009] NICA 30 (1 June 2009)
The correct legal test for determining 'primary occupation' for rating relief is an objective assessment of the facts, focusing on which occupation primarily engages the ratepayer's time, attention, and provides the main source of livelihood. The Lands Tribunal erred by taking into account subjective factors such as the respondent's personal commitment and preference for farming. Applying the objective test, the respondent's employment with the Council was his primary occupation, not farming.
- Citation
- [2009] NICA 30
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Ian Wilson; Respondent/appellant: Commissioner of Valuation
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Lands Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; decision of the Lands Tribunal quashed.
- Legal Topics
- Rating and Valuation, Agricultural Dwellings, Objective Vs Subjective Test in Occupation, Interpretation of Rates (northern Ireland) Order 1977
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Wilson
Appellant/respondent
Commissioner of Valuation
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Lands Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Lands Tribunal erred in law in determining that the respondent's house qualified as a farmhouse for rating purposes under Article 39 and Schedule 12 Part II of the Rates (Northern Ireland) Order 1977.
- 2 Whether the test for 'primary occupation' is objective or can include subjective factors.
Ratio Decidendi
The correct legal test for determining 'primary occupation' for rating relief is an objective assessment of the facts, focusing on which occupation primarily engages the ratepayer's time, attention, and provides the main source of livelihood. The Lands Tribunal erred by taking into account subjective factors such as the respondent's personal commitment and preference for farming. Applying the objective test, the respondent's employment with the Council was his primary occupation, not farming.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; decision of the Lands Tribunal quashed.
Orders
- Each of the questions posed in the case stated answered 'No'.
- The respondent's house is not to be entered in the Rating List as a farmhouse under the 1977 Order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment