Curley v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland [2008] NIFET 140_00 FET (17 November 2008)
The claimant was subjected to religious discrimination in promotion, entitling him to compensation for pecuniary loss and injury to feelings, with interest calculated from the date of the unlawful act. Insufficient evidence was provided for additional threshold payments or overtime as a senior Sergeant. The tribunal lacked power to order reinstatement of paid leave or rest days.
- Citation
- [2008] NIFET 140_00 FET
- Parties
- Claimant: Kevin Curley; First Named Respondent: Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland; Second Named Respondent: Superintendent McCallum
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Fair Employment Tribunal / Remedy Hearing Following Finding of Discrimination
- Outcome
- Claim upheld on remedy; compensation awarded to claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Religious Discrimination, Remedies, Injury to Feelings, Interest on Compensation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin Curley
Claimant
Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland
First Named Respondent
Superintendent McCallum
Second Named Respondent
Procedural Posture
Fair Employment Tribunal / Remedy Hearing Following Finding of Discrimination
Legal Issues
- 1 Assessment of remedy for religious discrimination in promotion
- 2 Entitlement to compensation for pecuniary loss and injury to feelings
- 3 Entitlement to interest on compensation
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was subjected to religious discrimination in promotion, entitling him to compensation for pecuniary loss and injury to feelings, with interest calculated from the date of the unlawful act. Insufficient evidence was provided for additional threshold payments or overtime as a senior Sergeant. The tribunal lacked power to order reinstatement of paid leave or rest days.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld on remedy; compensation awarded to claimant.
Orders
- First-named respondent to pay claimant £10,605.32.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment