Coulter v Sunday Newspapers Ltd [2017] NICA 10 (20 February 2017)
The trial judge erred in treating the impugned statements as assertions of fact rather than comment, thereby failing to consider the honest comment defence. This misdirection requires the judgment to be set aside and a retrial ordered.
- Citation
- [2017] NICA 10
- Parties
- Plaintiff/respondent: Robert James Gordon Coulter; Defendant/appellant: Sunday Newspapers Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal Defamation / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; order set aside; retrial ordered.
- Legal Topics
- Single Meaning Rule, Fact Vs Comment, Honest Comment Defence, Reynolds Privilege, Public Interest, Responsible Journalism, Quantum of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robert James Gordon Coulter
Plaintiff/respondent
Sunday Newspapers Ltd
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal Defamation / Appeal From High Court Judgment and Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in treating statements as fact rather than comment
- 2 Whether the single meaning rule was properly applied
- 3 Whether the honest comment defence should have been considered
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge erred in treating the impugned statements as assertions of fact rather than comment, thereby failing to consider the honest comment defence. This misdirection requires the judgment to be set aside and a retrial ordered.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; order set aside; retrial ordered.
Orders
- Order in favour of respondent quashed
- Retrial before a different judge directed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment