Grainger v Lough Erne Hotel Ltd Department for Employment and ... Castle Hotels NI Ltd [2014] NIIT 00300_11IT (04 February 2014)
There was a relevant transfer of the undertaking from Markville Trading Ltd to ACEC Enterprises Ltd on or about 30 April 2010/1 May 2010 under the TUPE Regulations. The claimant was not dismissed by Markville prior to the transfer, and continuity of employment was preserved. The temporary closure of the hotel did not break the chain of employment or prevent a relevant transfer.
- Citation
- [2014] NIIT 00300_11IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Catherine Claire Grainger; First Respondent: Lough Erne Hotel Ltd; Second Respondent: Department of Employment and Learning; Third Respondent: Castle Hotels NI Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal (pre Hearing Review) / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue determined in favour of the existence of a relevant transfer from Markville Trading Ltd to ACEC Enterprises Ltd under TUPE; no finding of dismissal by Markville; continuity of employment preserved.
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings (tupe), Relevant Transfer, Continuity of Employment, Dismissal, Insolvency, Employment Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Catherine Claire Grainger
Claimant
Lough Erne Hotel Ltd
First Respondent
Department of Employment and Learning
Second Respondent
Castle Hotels NI Ltd
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal (pre Hearing Review) / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a relevant transfer of undertakings under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 from Markville Trading Ltd to ACEC Enterprises Ltd or via Lough Erne Hotel Ltd;
- 2 Whether the claimant was dismissed in or about April/May 2010;
- 3 Whether the claimant was employed immediately before the transfer;
Ratio Decidendi
There was a relevant transfer of the undertaking from Markville Trading Ltd to ACEC Enterprises Ltd on or about 30 April 2010/1 May 2010 under the TUPE Regulations. The claimant was not dismissed by Markville prior to the transfer, and continuity of employment was preserved. The temporary closure of the hotel did not break the chain of employment or prevent a relevant transfer.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue determined in favour of the existence of a relevant transfer from Markville Trading Ltd to ACEC Enterprises Ltd under TUPE; no finding of dismissal by Markville; continuity of employment preserved.
Orders
- A further Case Management Discussion to be arranged to consider further case-management directions/orders for the determination of the claimant’s claim against the respondents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment