Olahova v Interserve (Facilities Managem... Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd (t... [2011] NIIT 00193_11IT (06 October 2011)

The claimant validly withdrew her claims against both respondents, received notice of proceedings, and failed to demonstrate grounds for review or extension of time; the interests of justice do not require revocation of dismissal decisions.

Citation: [2011] NIIT 00193_11IT
Parties: Claimant: Gabriela Olahova; First Respondent: Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd; Second Respondent: Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 06 October 2011
Procedural Posture: Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Review
Outcome: Applications for review dismissed; dismissal decisions confirmed.
Legal Topics: Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Working Time Regulations, Withdrawal of Claims, Review of Tribunal Decisions, Extension of Time

Employment Law Unfair Dismissal Race Discrimination Working Time Regulations Withdrawal of Claims Review of Tribunal Decisions Extension of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Gabriela Olahova

Claimant

Interserve (Facilities Management) Ltd

First Respondent

Sainsburys Supermarkets Ltd

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal / Decision on Review

Legal Issues

1 Whether claimant validly withdrew claims against respondents
2 Whether claimant received notice of proceedings leading to dismissal decisions
3 Whether extension of time for review should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Applications for review dismissed; dismissal decisions confirmed.

Orders

Claimant's application for extension of time to review dismissal against first respondent dismissed.
Claimant's application for review of dismissal against second respondent dismissed.