O'Driscoll v KPL Contracts Limited M & P Bradley Limited BSG Civil Engineering [2014] NIIT 166_13IT (27 January 2014)

O'Driscoll v KPL Contracts Limited M & P Bradley Limited BSG Civil Engineering [2014] NIIT 166_13IT (27 January 2014)

The claimant's assignment to the street lighting contract was temporary, not permanent, and thus he was not eligible for transfer under TUPE. The first respondent failed to follow statutory dismissal procedures, resulting in an automatically unfair dismissal. The claimant is entitled to compensation including a 50% uplift for the respondent's failure to follow procedures.

Citation
[2014] NIIT 166_13IT
Parties
Claimant: Austin O'Driscoll; First Respondent: KPL Contracts Limited; Second Respondent: M & P Bradley Limited; Third Respondent: BSG Civil Engineering
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
27 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Final Decision After Full Hearing
Outcome
Claim for unfair dismissal against first respondent upheld; claims against second and third respondents dismissed.
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, TUPE (transfer of Undertakings), Service Provision Change, Compensation Calculation, Statutory Dismissal Procedures
Employment Law Unfair Dismissal TUPE (transfer of Undertakings) Service Provision Change Compensation Calculation Statutory Dismissal Procedures

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Austin O'Driscoll

Claimant

KPL Contracts Limited

First Respondent

M & P Bradley Limited

Second Respondent

BSG Civil Engineering

Third Respondent

Procedural Posture

Industrial Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Final Decision After Full Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the first respondent
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's contract of employment transferred to the second respondent under the Service Provision Change (Protection of Employment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006
  3. 3 Quantum of compensation for unfair dismissal

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant's assignment to the street lighting contract was temporary, not permanent, and thus he was not eligible for transfer under TUPE. The first respondent failed to follow statutory dismissal procedures, resulting in an automatically unfair dismissal. The claimant is entitled to compensation including a 50% uplift for the respondent's failure to follow procedures.

Court Disposition

Claim for unfair dismissal against first respondent upheld; claims against second and third respondents dismissed.

Orders

  • First respondent to pay claimant £54,987.79 for unfair dismissal, including basic award, compensatory award, 50% uplift, and loss of statutory rights.
  • Recoupment notice applies for Jobseekers Allowance as per regulations.