Conway v Parfums Christian Dior (UK) Limited & Anor (Discrimination - Sexual Orientation Unfair Dismissal) [2018] NIIT 04148_17IT (13 June 2018)
The tribunal found no evidence of unlawful discrimination by Boots on grounds of sexual orientation and determined Dior's dismissal of the claimant for gross misconduct was within the band of reasonable responses for a reasonable employer. No prima facie case of discrimination was established and the dismissal was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] NIIT 04148_17IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Thomas Conway; First Respondent: Parfums Christian Dior (UK) Limited; Second Respondent: Boots UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 13 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Sexual Orientation Discrimination, Burden of Proof, Gross Misconduct
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Thomas Conway
Claimant
Parfums Christian Dior (UK) Limited
First Respondent
Boots UK Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by Dior
- 2 Whether Boots unlawfully discriminated against the claimant on grounds of sexual orientation
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found no evidence of unlawful discrimination by Boots on grounds of sexual orientation and determined Dior's dismissal of the claimant for gross misconduct was within the band of reasonable responses for a reasonable employer. No prima facie case of discrimination was established and the dismissal was fair under statutory and case law tests.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed
Orders
- Claims of unfair dismissal and unlawful discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment