R, Re Shared Residence Application [2002] NIFam 22 (24 October 2002)
A shared residence order is refused because it would likely exacerbate the mother's insecurity and anxiety, fuelled by the father's controlling behaviour, and risk emotional harm to the child. The acrimony between parents is too raw for such an order, and contact arrangements are imposed instead to protect the child's welfare.
- Citation
- [2002] NIFam 22
- Parties
- Applicant: A; Respondent: G
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Shared Residence Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- shared residence order refused; contact arrangements imposed
- Legal Topics
- Shared Residence, Contact Orders, Parental Responsibility, Child Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant
G
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Shared Residence Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a shared residence order should be granted for R
- 2 Appropriate contact arrangements for R
Ratio Decidendi
A shared residence order is refused because it would likely exacerbate the mother's insecurity and anxiety, fuelled by the father's controlling behaviour, and risk emotional harm to the child. The acrimony between parents is too raw for such an order, and contact arrangements are imposed instead to protect the child's welfare.
Court Disposition
shared residence order refused; contact arrangements imposed
Orders
- Child resides with mother except for specified contact periods with father: alternate weekends, Wednesdays, last Tuesday monthly.
- Summer holidays: three weeks with each parent; specific allocation of July and August holidays, alternating choice each year.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment