Weir & Anor, R v [2013] NICA 3 (14 January 2013)
The trial judge gave proper directions on identification evidence, offered counsel the opportunity to address the jury note and call further evidence, and emphasised that the only evidence for the jury was that heard in court; no material error or misdirection was established, and the convictions were not rendered...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] NICA 3
- Parties
- Applicant: Aaron Weir; Applicant: Gary Colin Cromie; Respondent: Public Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 14 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- applications for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Identification Evidence, Jury Communications, Forensic Evidence, Appeals Against Conviction
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aaron Weir
Applicant
Gary Colin Cromie
Applicant
Public Prosecution Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the identification evidence was sufficient and properly directed to the jury
- 2 Whether the handling of a note from a juror with specialist knowledge rendered the convictions unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge gave proper directions on identification evidence, offered counsel the opportunity to address the jury note and call further evidence, and emphasised that the only evidence for the jury was that heard in court; no material error or misdirection was established, and the convictions were not rendered unsafe.
Court Disposition
applications for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment