AB, Re Judicial Review [2010] NIQB 19 (16 February 2010)
Article 6 ECHR is not engaged in the applicant's disciplinary proceedings because the process does not deprive him of a civil right to practice his profession, but only concerns the potential loss of a specific job. The applicant's intellectual limitations do not transform the nature of the right at stake. Therefore, there is no entitlement to legal representation under Article 6 in this context.
- Citation
- [2010] NIQB 19
- Parties
- Applicant: AB; Respondent: Down District Council
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disciplinary Proceedings, Article 6 ECHR, Right to Legal Representation, Reasonable Adjustments, Civil Rights in Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Applicant
Down District Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Article 6 ECHR is engaged in internal disciplinary proceedings of an employee facing allegations of misconduct
- 2 Whether Article 6 ECHR requires legal representation at such a disciplinary hearing, particularly for a vulnerable employee
Ratio Decidendi
Article 6 ECHR is not engaged in the applicant's disciplinary proceedings because the process does not deprive him of a civil right to practice his profession, but only concerns the potential loss of a specific job. The applicant's intellectual limitations do not transform the nature of the right at stake. Therefore, there is no entitlement to legal representation under Article 6 in this context.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment