Nicholl v Abel Electrical and Serurity S... Brian Abel [2014] NIIT 323_14IT (11 April 2014)
The claimant's claims for notice pay and redundancy pay against the company are well-founded due to the company's failure to respond and the evidence provided by the claimant. The claims against Brian Abel were withdrawn and are dismissed.
- Citation
- [2014] NIIT 323_14IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Noel Nicholl; Respondent: Abel Electrical and Security Services Ltd; Respondent: Brian Abel
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claims for notice pay and redundancy pay against the company upheld; claims against Brian Abel dismissed as withdrawn.
- Legal Topics
- Notice Pay, Redundancy Pay, Withdrawal of Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Noel Nicholl
Claimant
Abel Electrical and Security Services Ltd
Respondent
Brian Abel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay from the company
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to redundancy pay from the company
- 3 Effect of withdrawal of claims against the second respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's claims for notice pay and redundancy pay against the company are well-founded due to the company's failure to respond and the evidence provided by the claimant. The claims against Brian Abel were withdrawn and are dismissed.
Court Disposition
Claims for notice pay and redundancy pay against the company upheld; claims against Brian Abel dismissed as withdrawn.
Orders
- The company shall pay the claimant £1,265 in respect of notice pay.
- The company is liable to make a redundancy payment of £8,475 to the claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment