McGonigle & Ors v Adria Ltd [2006] NIIT 254_04 (10 April 2006)
The tribunal found that the selection criteria for redundancy were reasonable, agreed with the union, and applied consistently and fairly to all claimants. No unfair selection was established.
- Citation
- [2006] NIIT 254_04
- Parties
- Claimant: Bernie McGonigle; Claimant: Mark Patrick Patton; Claimant: Malachy Conroy; Respondent: Adria Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Unfair Selection, Statutory Redundancy Entitlement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Parties
Bernie McGonigle
Claimant
Mark Patrick Patton
Claimant
Malachy Conroy
Claimant
Adria Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a reasonable procedure for redundancy and whether it was fairly implemented in the claimants' cases
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the selection criteria for redundancy were reasonable, agreed with the union, and applied consistently and fairly to all claimants. No unfair selection was established.
Court Disposition
Claims dismissed
Orders
- No unfair selection for redundancy found
- Applications dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment