Belford v Glass [2014] NIQB 134 (22 December 2014)
Roy's occupation of the Stump was permissive, not adverse, as it was with Bill's consent and there was no evidence Roy asserted possession in his own right. Therefore, the requirements for adverse possession under the Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 were not met.
- Citation
- [2014] NIQB 134
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Deane Belford as personal representative of the estate of John Dale Raymond Sandford deceased; Respondent/plaintiff: Ivan Glass as personal representative of the estate of William Robert Jacob Sandford deceased
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to High Court
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Limitation of Actions, Title to Land, Family Property Disputes
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Deane Belford as personal representative of the estate of John Dale Raymond Sandford deceased
Appellant/defendant
Ivan Glass as personal representative of the estate of William Robert Jacob Sandford deceased
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Roy (deceased) acquired possessory title to the Stump by adverse possession against Bill (deceased) or his estate
- 2 Whether Roy's occupation was permissive or adverse under the Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989
Ratio Decidendi
Roy's occupation of the Stump was permissive, not adverse, as it was with Bill's consent and there was no evidence Roy asserted possession in his own right. Therefore, the requirements for adverse possession under the Limitation (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 were not met.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment