De Souza v Boyce & Ors (Breach of Contract Unauthorised Deduction of Wages) [2018] NIIT 01700_18IT (22 May 2018)
The claims for wages, holiday pay, and notice pay are well-founded due to the respondent's failure to respond within the prescribed time limit.
- Citation
- [2018] NIIT 01700_18IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Haroldo William De Souza; Respondent: Alan Boyce & Others
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Default Judgment
- Outcome
- Claims upheld
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Unauthorised Deduction of Wages, Holiday Pay, Notice Pay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Haroldo William De Souza
Claimant
Alan Boyce & Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Default Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid wages
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to holiday pay
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to notice pay
Ratio Decidendi
The claims for wages, holiday pay, and notice pay are well-founded due to the respondent's failure to respond within the prescribed time limit.
Court Disposition
Claims upheld
Orders
- Mr Boyce shall pay £100 to the claimant in respect of wages
- Mr Boyce shall pay £350 to the claimant in respect of holiday pay
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment