Quigley v Alan Castle [2017] NIIT 01995_17IT (08 August 2017)

Quigley v Alan Castle [2017] NIIT 01995_17IT (08 August 2017)

The tribunal found, on the evidence, that the respondent owed the claimant holiday pay and failed to provide itemised pay statements for specified weeks. No order was made for deductions from wages due to lack of evidence on amounts.

Citation
[2017] NIIT 01995_17IT
Parties
Claimant: Richard Quigley; Respondent: Alan Castle
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
08 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Remedy Decision Following Default Judgment on Liability
Outcome
claim allowed in part
Legal Topics
Holiday Pay, Itemised Pay Statements, Unauthorised Deductions From Wages
Employment Law Holiday Pay Itemised Pay Statements Unauthorised Deductions From Wages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Richard Quigley

Claimant

Alan Castle

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Remedy Decision Following Default Judgment on Liability

Legal Issues

  1. 1 entitlement to holiday pay
  2. 2 failure to provide itemised pay statements
  3. 3 unlawful deduction from wages

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found, on the evidence, that the respondent owed the claimant holiday pay and failed to provide itemised pay statements for specified weeks. No order was made for deductions from wages due to lack of evidence on amounts.

Court Disposition

claim allowed in part

Orders

  • Respondent to pay claimant £122.60 as holiday pay.
  • Declaration that respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements for five specified weeks.