Gerhardus v Alan D'Ambrosio Linda Finlayson CIA Excel Group Limited [2012] NIIT 00936_12IT (24 September 2012)
The claimant was not paid wages for 2.5 months and was not provided with itemised pay statements; the tribunal awarded unpaid wages and declared the respondent failed to provide pay statements.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] NIIT 00936_12IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Herman Carl Gerhardus; Respondent: Alan D’Ambrosio; Respondent: Linda Finlayson; Respondent: CIA Excel Group Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed in part against the third-named respondent; first and second respondents dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Unpaid Wages, Itemised Pay Statement, Deductions From Wages
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Herman Carl Gerhardus
Claimant
Alan D’Ambrosio
Respondent
Linda Finlayson
Respondent
CIA Excel Group Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to unpaid wages for the period March 2012 to 23 May 2012
- 2 Whether the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements as required by law
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was not paid wages for 2.5 months and was not provided with itemised pay statements; the tribunal awarded unpaid wages and declared the respondent failed to provide pay statements.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed in part against the third-named respondent; first and second respondents dismissed.
Orders
- Award of £3,263.02 to the claimant for unpaid wages against CIA Excel Group Limited.
- CIA Excel Group Limited to provide the claimant with details of deductions from his pay for January to May 2012.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment