McNeice v Almac Clinical Services Ltd [2010] NIIT 1428_10IT (20 December 2010)

The claims were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend the time for presenting them; therefore, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claims.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2010] NIIT 1428_10IT
Parties: Claimant: Michael McNeice; Respondent: Almac Clinical Services Ltd; Respondent: Marinah Nicholson
Jurisdiction: Northern Ireland
Judgment Date: 20 December 2010
Procedural Posture: Employment Discrimination / Final Judgment
Outcome: claims dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Legal Topics: Race Discrimination, Sex Discrimination, Harassment, Limitation Period, Jurisdiction

Employment Law Race Discrimination Sex Discrimination Harassment Limitation Period Jurisdiction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Michael McNeice

Claimant

Almac Clinical Services Ltd

Respondent

Marinah Nicholson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Discrimination / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claims of race and sex discrimination and harassment were presented within the statutory time limit
2 Whether it is just and equitable to extend the time for presenting the claims

Ratio Decidendi

The claims were out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend the time for presenting them; therefore, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the claims.

Court Disposition

claims dismissed for want of jurisdiction

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.