Proctor v Young & Ors [2009] NIQB 56 (17 June 2009)

Proctor v Young & Ors [2009] NIQB 56 (17 June 2009)

The Council owed no duty to warn or protect the plaintiff against the obvious risks inherent in horse riding on a beach, which she voluntarily undertook as an experienced rider. The dangers were obvious, and the Council's practices were consistent with reasonable care. There was no breach of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 or the 1993 Regulations, which did not apply in these circumstances.

Citation
[2009] NIQB 56
Parties
Plaintiff: Amanda Proctor; First Named Defendant: George Young; Second Named Defendant: Coleraine Borough Council; Third Party: Douglas McClarty t/a McClarty and Company
Jurisdiction
Northern Ireland
Judgment Date
17 June 2009
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Negligence and Statutory Duty / Liability Trial (quantum Reserved)
Outcome
Plaintiff's action dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Occupiers' Liability Act 1957, Workplace (health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations (ni) 1993, Volenti Non Fit Injuria, Obvious Dangers, Risk Assessment, Duty to Warn, Statutory Interpretation
Tort Law Occupiers' Liability Health and Safety Law Negligence Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 Workplace (health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations (ni) 1993 Volenti Non Fit Injuria Obvious Dangers +3 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amanda Proctor

Plaintiff

George Young

First Named Defendant

Coleraine Borough Council

Second Named Defendant

Douglas McClarty t/a McClarty and Company

Third Party

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Negligence and Statutory Duty / Liability Trial (quantum Reserved)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Coleraine Borough Council owed a duty of care to the plaintiff under common law or statute for injuries sustained while horse riding on the beach.
  2. 2 Whether the Council breached the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 or the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations (NI) 1993.

Ratio Decidendi

The Council owed no duty to warn or protect the plaintiff against the obvious risks inherent in horse riding on a beach, which she voluntarily undertook as an experienced rider. The dangers were obvious, and the Council's practices were consistent with reasonable care. There was no breach of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 or the 1993 Regulations, which did not apply in these circumstances.

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's action dismissed