Laird v Annesborough Engineering Ltd [2013] NIIT 01148_13IT (23 August 2013)
The tribunal found that the claim was presented outside the statutory time limit but it was not reasonably practicable to present it earlier due to deliberate misrepresentation by the respondent. The claim was presented within a further reasonable period. The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, and the claim is well-founded.
- Citation
- [2013] NIIT 01148_13IT
- Parties
- Claimant: Noel Laird; Respondent: Annesborough Engineering Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unauthorised Deduction of Wages, Limitation Period, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Noel Laird
Claimant
Annesborough Engineering Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages presented within the statutory time limit?
- 2 Did the respondent make unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages?
- 3 Should time be extended for presenting the claim?
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claim was presented outside the statutory time limit but it was not reasonably practicable to present it earlier due to deliberate misrepresentation by the respondent. The claim was presented within a further reasonable period. The respondent made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages, and the claim is well-founded.
Court Disposition
claim allowed
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay the claimant £2,964.44 for unauthorised deductions.
- The respondent's title is amended to Annesborough Engineering Ltd.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment