Wood v Barbour [2007] NIIT 2590_06 (29 August 2007)
The claimant was unfairly dismissed due to the respondents' total failure to follow statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures, entitling him to compensation including an uplift of 50%. The respondents also failed to provide required employment documentation and pay slips, justifying further awards.
- Citation
- [2007] NIIT 2590_06
- Parties
- Claimant: Matthew Wood; Respondent: Anthony Barbour; Respondent: James Mawhinney; Respondent: Ann's Pantry
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Failure to Provide Written Particulars of Employment, Unauthorised Deductions, Failure to Provide Paid Annual Leave, Failure to Provide Itemised Pay Slips
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matthew Wood
Claimant
Anthony Barbour
Respondent
James Mawhinney
Respondent
Ann's Pantry
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether the respondents breached statutory employment obligations
- 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to compensation for failure to provide employment documentation and pay slips
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant was unfairly dismissed due to the respondents' total failure to follow statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures, entitling him to compensation including an uplift of 50%. The respondents also failed to provide required employment documentation and pay slips, justifying further awards.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Respondents to pay £25,732.50 as compensation for unfair dismissal (including 50% uplift)
- Respondents to pay £2,450 in respect of notice pay
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment