Fox & Ors, R v [2009] NICC 28 (24 April 2009)
The connections between the categories of allegations in the indictment are too tenuous to justify all counts against all accused being joined in one indictment; therefore, the counts against Richard Thomas Fox and Kathleen Bridget Fox are misjoined and must be severed.
- Citation
- [2009] NICC 28
- Parties
- Prosecution: The Queen; Defendant: Anthony Michael Fox; Defendant: Kathleen Bridget Fox; Defendant: Richard Thomas Fox; Defendant: Thomas Fox; Defendant: Patrick Francis Markey; Defendant: Leonard Henry Warwick
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling on Misjoinder and Severance
- Outcome
- Counts against Richard Thomas Fox and Kathleen Bridget Fox are declared misjoined; indictment to be amended or severed.
- Legal Topics
- Misjoinder, Severance of Counts, Indictment Practice, Money Laundering, Fraud, Duty Evasion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen
Prosecution
Anthony Michael Fox
Defendant
Kathleen Bridget Fox
Defendant
Richard Thomas Fox
Defendant
Thomas Fox
Defendant
Patrick Francis Markey
Defendant
Leonard Henry Warwick
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Pre Trial Ruling on Misjoinder and Severance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the counts against Richard Thomas Fox and Kathleen Bridget Fox are properly joined with the other counts in the indictment
- 2 Whether the indictment should be severed or amended due to misjoinder
Ratio Decidendi
The connections between the categories of allegations in the indictment are too tenuous to justify all counts against all accused being joined in one indictment; therefore, the counts against Richard Thomas Fox and Kathleen Bridget Fox are misjoined and must be severed.
Court Disposition
Counts against Richard Thomas Fox and Kathleen Bridget Fox are declared misjoined; indictment to be amended or severed.
Orders
- Counts 54, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 and 96 against Richard Thomas Fox are misjoined.
- Counts 93, 94 and 96 against Kathleen Fox are misjoined.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment