Belch v Ards Development Bureau & Community Network [2007] NIIT 200_07 (9 August 2007)
The time for presentation of the claimant's claims was automatically extended by Regulation 15, making it unnecessary to consider jurisdictional issues at this stage. The claim for breach of contract was allowed to be added and deemed within time.
- Citation
- [2007] NIIT 200_07
- Parties
- Claimant: Kathryn Belch; Respondent: Ards Development Bureau & Community Network
- Jurisdiction
- Northern Ireland
- Judgment Date
- 05 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
- Outcome
- Claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract to proceed to tribunal hearing.
- Legal Topics
- Unauthorised Deductions From Wages, Breach of Contract, Jurisdiction, Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kathryn Belch
Claimant
Ards Development Bureau & Community Network
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Industrial Tribunal / Pre Hearing Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction to hear the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages in view of Article 55(2) and 55(4) of the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996
- 2 Whether the claim for breach of contract is within time limits
Ratio Decidendi
The time for presentation of the claimant's claims was automatically extended by Regulation 15, making it unnecessary to consider jurisdictional issues at this stage. The claim for breach of contract was allowed to be added and deemed within time.
Court Disposition
Claims for unauthorised deductions from wages and breach of contract to proceed to tribunal hearing.
Orders
- Leave granted to amend claim to include breach of contract
- Claims to be listed for tribunal hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment